| 1) by Ace * [08/7/08 01:28:59 PM] |
Wow, I wonder what speed that's at.
First |
| |
| 2) by God * [08/7/08 03:52:39 PM] |
Yes folks I am great!!! |
| |
| 3) by Poker_Thom [08/8/08 04:22:09 AM] |
Hey Ace : It`s called the speed of light...186,000
miles per second,...did you miss that day of scho
ol? God : If your so FOCKING great,...how come I n
ever got that Pony? You BASTARD!......I`m FIRST be
cause everyone else is to chickenshit to log on so
that makes me 1st....that`s the rule,...too bad y
ou losers,.....I DRINK YOUR MILKSHAKE,...I...DRINK
...YOUR MILKSHAKE....DRAINAGE...DRAINAGE.!!!!....Y
ou silly boy!
|
| |
| 4) by nbfnj * [08/11/08 04:06:06 AM] |
he was talking about the camera speed you f**ktard |
| |
| 5) by cinderblock * [08/11/08 11:38:01 AM] |
way to go thom... fucking moron... |
| |
| 6) by Ace * [08/11/08 07:33:04 PM] |
Inbred moron FTL.
It's called FPS, you might need
to look that need up.
|
| |
| 7) by Unreg* * [08/12/08 09:00:59 AM] |
Poker_Thom: So you think that lightning is spreadi
ng at the speed of light? I think your computer wo
uld be faster if that was true...
|
| |
| 8) by unreg * [08/15/08 10:23:51 PM] |
This is actually incorrect. First, lightning spre
ads from the more positively charged place(ground)
up, not from the sky downward. As well, all those
branches wouldn't occur at that speed. If a came
ra were able to take this quick a picture, it woul
d be almost impossibly fast. Taking a single phot
o of lightning requires dozens, to hundreds of sho
ts a minute. Plus the tertiary effect, the repeti
tive lighting of already non-moving bolts wouldn't
occur, without a directionary movement of the bol
t. Still, a cool effect. Just fake
|
| |
